Tropical Cyclone Report
Tropical Depression Nine-E
23 - 26 August 2004
Richard J. Pasch
National Hurricane Center 12 November 2004
Nine-E appears to have originated from a
tropical wave that moved off the African coast on 8 August. This
system traveled westward across the tropical Atlantic basin with
only isolated deep convection associated with it. The wave crossed
Central America on 15 August, and for the next few days, while the
system moved westward to the south of Mexico, it generated only
sporadic deep convection. A persistent area of disturbed weather
associated with the wave was first noted on 19 August about 725
miles south-southwest of Cabo San Lucas, Mexico. This area moved
west-northwestward, and remained poorly organized, with the cloud
pattern elongated from southwest to northeast. By 23 August, the
convection became organized into a more circular pattern, and it is
estimated that a tropical depression formed around 1800 UTC that
day about 800 n mi west-southwest of Cabo San Lucas. Initially, the
cyclone moved northward to north-northwestward, while strengthening
only slightly to its peak intensity of 30 kt. On 24 August, the
depression turned west-northwestward and it maintained this course
for a couple of days. Low water temperatures and southerly to
southwesterly shear prevented strengthening, and a building low- to
mid-level ridge caused the cyclone to turn westward on 26 August,
by which time the cyclone had lost all deep convection. The remnant
low moved west-southwestward for a couple of days, and dissipated
on 28 August about 950 n mi east of Hilo, Hawaii. The "best track"
of this depression is listed in Table 1 and displayed in
Figure 1.
Table 1: Best track for Tropical Depression
Nine-E, 23-26 August 2004.
Date/Time (UTC) | Position | Pressure (mb) | Wind Speed (kt) | Stage |
Lat. (°N) | Lon. (°W) |
| 23 / 1800 | 17.3 | 123.6 | 1008 | 25 | tropical depression |
| 24 / 0000 | 17.8 | 123.7 | 1006 | 30 | " |
| 24 / 0600 | 18.2 | 123.9 | 1005 | 30 | " |
| 24 / 1200 | 18.4 | 124.2 | 1005 | 30 | " |
| 24 / 1800 | 18.6 | 124.8 | 1005 | 30 | " |
| 25 / 0000 | 18.9 | 125.4 | 1005 | 30 | " |
| 25 / 0600 | 19.2 | 126.0 | 1007 | 25 | " |
| 25 / 1200 | 19.4 | 126.8 | 1007 | 25 | " |
| 25 / 1800 | 19.7 | 127.7 | 1009 | 25 | " |
| 26 / 0000 | 19.9 | 128.7 | 1009 | 25 | " |
| 26 / 0600 | 20.0 | 129.7 | 1009 | 25 | " |
| 26 / 1200 | 20.0 | 130.8 | 1009 | 25 | " |
| 26 / 1800 | 19.9 | 131.9 | 1009 | 25 | remnant low |
| 27 / 0000 | 19.8 | 133.2 | 1009 | 20 | " |
| 27 / 0600 | 19.7 | 134.1 | 1009 | 20 | " |
| 27 / 1200 | 19.5 | 135.0 | 1009 | 20 | " |
| 27 / 1800 | 19.0 | 136.0 | 1010 | 20 | " |
| 28 / 0000 | 18.5 | 137.0 | 1010 | 20 | " |
| 28 / 0600 | 18.0 | 138.5 | 1010 | 20 | " |
| 28 / 1200 | | | | | dissipated |
| 24 / 0600 | 18.2 | 123.9 | 1005 | 30 | minimum pressure |
Figure 1:
Best track positions for
Tropical Depression Nine-E, 23-26 August 2004.
|